Talk:In Her Shoes (film)

Dyslexia?
I might be wrong, but was it ever actually confirmed that Maggie was dyslexic? I thought it was just the retired professor that mentioned it, without a reply. It might have been mentioned elsewhere to do with the film, but I'm fairly certain it wasn't mentioned within the actual film. Sky83 (talk) 21:23, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Having read the article for the book, I now see that she is dyslexic in that, but I still don't believe it is actually said in the film. Sky83 (talk) 21:38, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

She herself tries to pretend as somebody cool, who hasn't got this problem, like most of all humans do if they are called dull.--Danaide (talk) 17:34, 21 February 2009 (UTC) The second meaning of reading is to analyse and set up frames and relations between the story, the figures and the circumstances. That#s not the figure maggies meaning.....[SSS]--Danaide (talk) 17:41, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Not only the professor mentioned this disease.Her sister hurts her, being hurt by seductiv stuff, by repeating her learn problem and acting it out. Maggie can't get a job as a moderator at tv, because she isn't able to read from a telepromptor quickly.So the lack of managing letters or transforming words into speech is three times visible in that film fiction.
 * To read or to read may be somthing interpretative either. The first form of reading means to be able to understand the contents of some letters or words. To contextualise and to tell stories like they are written.

'''== Whose perspective? ==''' Directing on the lack? The missings figures view determines some situations. Tensefull!--Danaide (talk) 17:46, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The film is so to say dealing with sentimental family or sibblig relations. To me it#s hard to recognize what is the real directing perspective. The Lacan system RIS is somehow flowing between the figures but the narrators perspective changes.