Talk:In Practice Systems Limited

Deletion
There are ten references. How many do you want? The other three other approved GP systems have articles. Why shouldnt this one?

In what respect is it like an advert? NB I have no connection with the firm of any kind. Rathfelder (talk) 18:52, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi :) I added those maintance tags as: the article read to me as a promotion of the company's products more than anything else; and the none of the references could be said to contain more than trival mentions of the article subject. That said, User:Drchriswilliams has sinced fixed the previously broken link to the EHI PC Interview which seems like a great source for this article. I might still lean towards WP:Ncorp like User:Xxanthippe but Chris's improvements show that I might be wrong. Liam McM 22:20, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Article is nothing but corporate blurb and should be deleted WP:Ncorp. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:32, 17 January 2021 (UTC).
 * The Digital Health article is long and detailed. Rathfelder (talk) 23:58, 17 January 2021 (UTC)