Talk:In Theory/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Midnightblueowl (talk · contribs) 18:58, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

This all looks pretty good, but I have a few points of possible improvement to put forward. Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:58, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

I would really recommend preserving these links via a web archive, lest they become deadlinks at some point in the future. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:15, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * In the "Plot" section:
 * We don't mention that Data is an android; perhaps this is a point worth making? Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:07, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * There is a reference to "Captain Picard" but he hasn't been properly introduced in the main prose of the article, just the lede. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:07, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Why do we give the names of most characters but then refer to "Commander Riker" as opposed to "Will Riker"? Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:07, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The same can be said for "Chief O'Brian". Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:07, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * We use "Lt." here but perhaps it would be best to spell out "Lieutenant". Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:07, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * "sub-routine" then "subroutine". Standardise to one spelling. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:07, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * In Production:
 * Jonathan Frakes is a duplink. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:12, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * In Reception:
 * No need to have quotation marks around Jammer's Reviews if it is the name of a website. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:12, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * "having Captain Picard pilot" - no need to call him "Captain" here. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:12, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review, I think I've addressed everything and added those archiveurls. Miyagawa (talk) 19:19, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Another great piece of work. I'm happy to pass this now. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:22, 6 August 2016 (UTC)