Talk:In re Sealed Case No. 02-001

Untitled

 * 69.140.157.227 (talk) 23:02, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Disagree on Merger
I disagree that In re Sealed Case should be merged into the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review article. The decision was historic and separate. Perhaps if there were hundreds of disclosures, a "greatest hits" section could be added to the article. But, as it stands now, I recommend the articles not be merged. Saebvn (talk) 21:46, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Technical
I tagged this page as technical. It has way too much legal terminology and fails to explain what the decision means in common language. D O N D E groovily  Talk to me  21:13, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

>In process of expanding and explaining in common language. Drkersdeofgry (talk) 16:32, 17 March 2015 (UTC)