Talk:In the Company of Men

Bullshit
"The film currently has an 88% Fresh rating at the movie review aggregate site Rotten Tomatoes, with 46 out of 52 critics rating it "Fresh".

How does bullshit like this find it's way into an encyclopaedia?

--No clue. This whole article sucks. This is probably the worst-written article I've ever seen on Wikipedia. Was this someone's high-school essay on this movie? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.193.182.86 (talk) 02:52, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Actually the review rating is backed up by RT, with the percentage being a little higher than it is in the article. It does need cleanup, but this easily passes WP:NFILM.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:52, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on In the Company of Men. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130306152613/http://www.playbill.com/news/article/173227-Neil-LaButes-Revised-Stage-Version-of-In-the-Company-of-Men-To-Premiere-in-Chicago to http://www.playbill.com/news/article/173227-Neil-LaButes-Revised-Stage-Version-of-In-the-Company-of-Men-To-Premiere-in-Chicago

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:14, 11 December 2017 (UTC)