Talk:Incepta Pharmaceuticals

Fair use rationale for Image:Incepta logo.gif
Image:Incepta logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Copyright issue nailed down - a stub to roll back to is available
The bulk of the copyvio from http://www.inceptapharma.com/our-growth.php was introduced on 30 December 2012‎ by 180.234.72.188.

[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Incepta_Pharmaceuticals&diff=next&oldid=149038562 This edit] of 4 August 2007 by Rhode Island Red introduced text lifted almost verbatim from http://www.inceptapharma.com/ (one change was "35 km" to "35 miles" - go figure). The last "clean" edit is this edit of 00:14, 4 August 2007, also by Rhode Island Red.

While you COULD roll back to the last clean edit, the version you would roll back to would be borderline-A7 and, if not improved, would easily fail at AFD. I recommend just deleting and allowing any editor to starting over from scratch if nobody does a rewrite soon. Please make a specific note that the revision of 00:14, 4 August 2007 should be eligible for WP:REFUND if anyone asks for it. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  04:36, 4 June 2013 (UTC)