Talk:Income Tax Department

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 August 2019 and 5 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: SwayamBhatia.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 23:18, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Merge
I propose to merge Income Tax Department Karnataka & Goa into this article since its a branch of this article. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools-ec/?user=Capankajsmilyo&project=en.wikipedia.org count])  10:42, 21 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Don't see any reason as to why you should. The Karnataka ITD is one largest tax collection agencies. Read WP:BRANCH Uncletomwood (talk) 05:48, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Please support your arguments with certain references. As I can see now, it's a mere list with no reference at all. It's better to merge it in this article. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools-ec/?user=Capankajsmilyo&project=en.wikipedia.org count])  06:09, 21 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Don't think any further arguments had been necessary had you properly understood WP:BRANCH, nevertheless here's your reference: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bengaluru/Karnataka-Goa-has-highest-growth-rate-in-I-T-collection/articleshow/53246892.cms. References can be added to it. Why don't you help? Uncletomwood (talk) 15:57, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * The policy you cited states "Aim for one good article, not multiple permanent stubs:". Are you sure you've read it? -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools-ec/?user=Capankajsmilyo&project=en.wikipedia.org count])  16:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Is this a stub? Uncletomwood (talk) 17:57, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * This is definitely not a good article and I don't see any possibility of it becoming so. So, if you consider it to be one, I suggest you work on the article instead of arguing here. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools-ec/?user=Capankajsmilyo&project=en.wikipedia.org count])  19:52, 21 July 2016 (UTC)


 * 80% OF Wikipedia articles do not have the 'status' good articles. Going by your argument, should all the non-good status articles be merged or deleted?. Well, you have your answer. I'm doing that, as you already have seen. Why don't you help, instead of arguing here? Uncletomwood (talk) 12:18, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Closing the merge proposal, given that stale and with no consensus. Klbrain (talk) 22:53, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

A comment to enlighten any future discussion on wiki pages for regions of Income Tax Department: If we consider any successful state in past or in present we find that they had/have extensive network for collection of revenue and then using it for policing/army and general administration. So taxation agencies had/have wide network across the territories of their state and therefore a huge network of tax collection exists. Therefore it's quite logical to have regional subdivision (region/zones etc similar to states/districts for general administration) of such a wide tax collection network. These subdivision acquire their distinct identities because of social, cultural, political, economic, and organisational reasons. Therefore it's very much logical and practical to create independent article for each of these so called subdivisions. JPskylight (talk) 19:24, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Re-organisation of whole article
I propose to re-organise this article on lines of Internal Revenue Service article. A more expanded version is vision at this time. Anybody willing to contribute can share his/her thoughts. JPskylight (talk) 19:02, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Since there are no objections, whatsoever, hence I am going ahead with re-organisation of article. JPskylight (talk) 05:36, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Removal of Refimprove
Template Message: Refimprove was put in July 2016. I propose to remove it, since I think a lot of content has been added with proper references in last few weeks. Anyways article reviews will still have comments about quality of content in talk page hence that will ensure further improvements by willing Wikipedia editors. JPskylight (talk) 19:25, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Since there is no response from whomsoever, hence I am going ahead with proposal. JPskylight (talk) 11:11, 17 August 2019 (UTC)