Talk:Incumbency advantage for appointed U.S. senators

General
Hello Erhall (talk) 22:01, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Looks good for now; knowing that you will add more. Good start of sources. Jessben12 (talk)

I like the direction that you are taking with your research, looks like a strong beginning. Kdrost09 (talk) 22:50, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

winona2012 Looks like a good start, you have clearly defined what the goal of your research is. Now you just need to expand.

Interesting sources, has your question been been asked or answered before? A further review of your literature may answer! Jlinehan07 (talk) 22:17, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Looks like a good start are you going to look at any sources that look at any other variables? I look forward to seeing these sources reviewed more in depth. Jjdick3978 (talk)

Interesting sources, has your question been been asked or answered before? A further review of your literature may answer! Jlinehan07 (talk) 23:13, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Im really interested in your topic and look forward to seeing the direction you take your own research. Ytfig11 (talk) 23:09, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Good start! I look forward to your research, it is an interesting topic! Nice use of source citing. Cstene07 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cstene07 (talk • contribs) 07:56, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

You're off to a great start. A little short, but I like where you are going with this. Very interesting topic and props for correctly citing your sources! Keep up the good work!BBurns08 (talk) 17:43, 21 February 2011 (UTC)BBurns08

I'm looking forward to the continuation of our topics discussed last semester. I think you're off to a great start, and your citations are looking marvelous. I admire that you're willing to admit a scare of redundancy... I think we'll all struggle with that. Wjansen08 (talk) 20:14, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

What evidence did your resources provide you? The next step is to share the evidence and specifics from the research you are reviewing in preparation for your project. Start the migration from summarizing what you are going to do to your specific findings from the literature. Erhall (talk) 04:24, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Man, i love the idea of a wikipedia user basically compiling their own report on a topic, using cutting edge source selection - original wikipedia knowledge production! This article was so cool. Selecting specific sources that you want, as long as they are academic and trusted and topic relevant, and combining them - more hard hitting than a regular article, not biased or made up, relevant, especially for sub sub topics or stubs or technical topics - I enjoyed this article more than many I have read, glad I found it. -nathanielfirst — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nathanielfirst (talk • contribs) 15:15, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment
This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Winona State University supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program&#32;during the 2011 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:35, 2 January 2023 (UTC)