Talk:Independence Pass (Colorado)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Tea with toast (talk · contribs) 23:55, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

I plan to review this article bit by bit over the next week. -- Tea with toast  (話)  23:55, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

I apologize for the delay in completing this review. I didn't have as much time as I had anticipated over the holiday break. -- Tea with toast  (話)  00:01, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * I can see an impressive amount of research went into writing this article. I appreciate the depth of content in the article.
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * Nice images, and appropriately placed too.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Well done!
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * Nice images, and appropriately placed too.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Well done!
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Well done!