Talk:Independent Commission for Equity in Cricket

Membership
The article looks pretty good. I think it could do with a section listing the members and their professions (to indicate why they might have been selected). I'll add that myself when I have a moment, or if someone would like to beat me to it then that's fine. JH (talk page) 08:40, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Quotes
The quotes I've used have triggered the copyvio bot, should I remove some of them? Hard to tell if this will cause a problem further down the line. Desertarun (talk) 18:51, 20 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The quotes are clearly attributed and I don't think they are excessive. I'd have said that they fall within "fair use". I suppose the one that could be seen as over-long is the one from Sport England, but I've seen longer ones in many of our cricket biographies. (I saw in my Watched log that a copyvio bot had flagged a revision for review, and as I couldn't find any way to determine which edit corresponded to that revision number I was afraid that my own edit putting in the members and their qualifications might have triggered it! So I'm relieved to learn that at least it wasn't my doing.) BTW, thanks for all your work on this article. JH (talk page) 07:24, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I'll trim the sportengland quote and leave the rest. I'd considered making this article some time ago, but then got distracted so the reminder was helpful! Desertarun (talk) 08:25, 21 September 2023 (UTC)