Talk:Independent business

AQA controversy
Don't think the AQA controversy is related at all. Especially as the section is opinionated and has zero sources. If you keep the section, maybe have a more neutral stance and views from both sides? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.149.217.142 (talk) 12:20, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Yep, I agree with you. I don't think it's notable enough to be included on this Wikipedia page, possibly (only possibly), on the AQA GCSE page (if there is one). I know that there are news articles about it (like the one in the press template above) but I don't think even these warrant its inclusion.  Seagull123  Φ  17:37, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

I've just removed the GCSE bit from the article for the reasons given above. If you disagree, please discuss here/revert.  Seagull123  Φ  22:00, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 24 May 2016
NOT A BIOLOGY QUESTION — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.109.56.66 (talk) 17:35, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * ❌ If you would like to request a change to be made, please do it in the format of "please change XXXX to YYYY". Have a look at the Edit semi-protected template for more information. Thanks!  Seagull123  Φ  20:11, 24 May 2016 (UTC)