Talk:Indian Head gold pieces/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: – Plarem (User &#124; talk &#124; contribs) 19:52, 24 August 2011 (UTC)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * The prose is clear and concise, respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct; the spelling and grammar follow an established system. (American English). The article follows Wikipedia's Manual of Style.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * There is a good amount of references, the sources are reliable and this article contains no original research.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * It contains most major aspects and is focused on the subject.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * The article represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * I can see the page is stable with no edit wars, etc. since its creation on the 19 August, 2011.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * All the images are tagged & non-free images have fair use rationales, the pictures are appropriately used and have suitable captions.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * – Plarem (User &#124; talk &#124; contribs) Flag of Europe.svg 19:52, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

PASSED – I pass this article under the Good Article Criteria – Plarem (User &#124; talk &#124; contribs)  19:52, 24 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you for reviewing it.--Wehwalt (talk) 19:55, 24 August 2011 (UTC)