Talk:Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Mrt3366 (talk · contribs) 07:41, 24 April 2013 (UTC) :

Looks like a good article to me. The level of information is good, looks credible more importantly.

Summary

 * GA1: The article is mostly clear and concise, and written in great detail.
 * GA2: A good list of references are listed, however some are incorrectly formatted, and may need to be fixed for being selected as Good Article Status. However, several references have problems such as dead links, missing titles (ref 101-105), etc.
 * GA3: This article definitely covers the topic well.
 * GA4: No obvious bias.
 * GA5: No content disputes or edit war is currently active.
 * GA6: Images correctly added where applicable.

In short, the article is well-written and once the above-mentioned issues are surmounted, I reckon this can be listed as a good-article.

Checklist
Mr T (Talk?)  [ (New thread?) ] 07:41, 24 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Most of the issues mentioned above have now been addressed. Please specify any outstanding issues that still need to be handled.
 * Batram (talk) 14:37, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Issues are sorted, so ✅.  Mr T  (Talk?)  [ (New thread?) ] 14:14, 3 May 2013 (UTC)