Talk:Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad/GA2

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

Currently identified problems
These issues would mean a quick fail at GAN, but I'm bringing it here to see if it can be fixed instead of being delisted. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  18:00, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Copyright violations; I've removed one section already and there are more that require checking
 * Content not in source: e.g. "The Post-Graduate Programme in Agribusiness Management (PGP-ABM) is a two-year fully residential management programme." -- the linked source doesn't mention anything about this
 * Primary sources and poor quality press releases: Contentious and flowery content sourced to the institute's website.
 * Neutrality: Reuse of press releases doesn't give a story, instead it presents disjointed statements (e.g. the architecture section)
 * Scope: The article is very limited in scope and reads more like a PowerPoint presentation and does not cover any of the listed titles in a proper manner.

Here's the link about PGP-ABM now known as PGP-FABM, the official site has not yet changed the name everywhere.Esperanza 1409 (talk) 22:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC)


 * This article does not deserve GA status. It is being continuously disrupted by IP promotional edits from IIMA itself. Sigmabaroda (talk) 03:56, 14 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Here's an assessment based on the criteria:

Based on the above assessment I'm delisting the article. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  12:12, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Well written: ❌
 * 2) *Disjointed sections, no flow within the article, found some copyvios, there may be more.
 * 3) Verifiable with no original research: ❌
 * 4) *Mostly primary sources, press releases; a lot of unsourced content.
 * 5) Broad in its coverage: ❌
 * 6) *Weak on history, organizational structure, location/architecture etc while heavy on recent news.
 * 7) Neutral: ❌
 * 8) *Not neutral as sections are used to promote a certain point of view.
 * 9) Stable: ❌
 * 10) *Unstable with constant back and forth between multiple points of view.
 * 11) Illustrated, if possible, by images:✅
 * 12) *Reasonable use of images, properly licensed.