Talk:Indian migrant workers during the COVID-19 pandemic

Compilation of the Migrant Exodus coverage in the news and media
Hey there, I just put together a compilation of news pieces in an attempt to track the on-going migrants crisis. It is a dynamic list, which I will try my best to keep updating, it can be a great help for editors trying to find reliable sources to cite. I have collected the pieces and sorted them chronologically and state-wise. I hope it helps. Here's the link to the compilation. Link Ashlesh007 (talk) 14:30, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * , thanks a ton! SerChevalerie (talk) 17:58, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I am still updating it as we speak, I just added a new filter, called "Categories", you can sort the data and view it by categories. Also let me know if you have any suggestions or stuff that we can do to help you out if possible. Ashlesh007 (talk) 22:25, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 * , wow that's some amazing work! Regarding suggestions to help out, I feel we could significantly expand the section on Shramik Special trains, and over time, maybe even create a WP:CFORK article from the same (currently I have created a redirect). Additionally, we could definitely cover the initial days of migrants in more detail... I believe some clarity on their condition had been reached by the first week of April. SerChevalerie (talk) 13:04, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry for getting back so late. Sounds great, will look into it! Will also look into how we can cover the initial days in more details. Ashlesh007 (talk) 17:12, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Consider for inclusion
SerChevalerie, the NITI Aayog CEO, Amitabh Kant, said that the "migrant workers crisis was poorly handled". (link) He blames the states. (link) DTM (talk) 11:44, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks, will add it. SerChevalerie (talk) 11:58, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * SerChevalerie This is interesting too, the statistic gives a figure to the crisis.
 * "Railways transported 31,00,000 migrants back to their homes in the special trains allocated for them between 1 May and 21 May." (taken from Economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in India) You can makes expansions as you want of course in this article. There was another PC today by railways about migrants. They said some interesting things too. DTM (talk) 12:31, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks, added! SerChevalerie (talk) 13:43, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * SerChevalerie, we have contradictory figures in the media I think, if not then this is the largest figure so far. "As many as 3,700 special trains for transporting migrants have operated between May 1-27 and 91 lakh migrants have already been shifted" The Hindu. This is larger than the 48 lakh migrants mentioned in the article for the same date period. DTM (talk) 11:47, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
 * , I believe that the figure is correct, representing the total number of migrants transported by both, trains and buses. Currently I've mentioned them separately, but will mention them together for clarity. SerChevalerie (talk) 13:02, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh yes, I didn't read the article properly. 91 lakh includes both trains and buses. DTM (talk) 05:20, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Important addition needed
SerChevalerie, this is important with respect to this article - Garib Kalyan Rojgar Abhiyaan - Maybe it can even be changed to a redirect if needed DTM (talk) 07:49, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Hey there, thanks for the ping. I noticed that the article was created by you. Do you think that there is enough information to expand it to an article of its own? If not, then a redirect would be fine; I have done the same with "Shramik Special trains". SerChevalerie (talk) 12:36, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi . I was actually just waiting to see how much the scheme would be reported on. Inherently it seems important enough. As of now I would let it be for a few days more; after which redirecting it will be a much easier call. And if you think it should be redirected now, go ahead. We can later change it if needed. DTM (talk) 10:42, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
 * , makes sense. For now I'll leave the status quo, and add the info from the article to this one. Redirect we can look into later. SerChevalerie (talk) 12:26, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://doi.org/10.31838/ijpr/2020.12.03.468 http://www.ijpronline.com/ViewArticleDetail.aspx?ID=18407. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Sam Sailor 21:35, 21 June 2021 (UTC)