Talk:Indiana-class battleship/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: DraconianDebate (talk) 17:47, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

GA guidelines require Good Articles to meet the following criteria.

Well Written
The prose is clear and the spelling and grammar are correct Other than a few issues with spelling and grammar (which I have corrected), the article passes this requirement.

Complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to avoid, fiction, and list incorporation. The lead section and layout meet the guidelines of the manual of style. As well, there are no words to avoid, works of fiction, or lists contained within this article.

Factually accurate and verifiable
Provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout The reference section complies with WP:Layout

Provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons Article provides reasonable use of citation from a wide range of sources.

Contains no original research. From what I can see, all information presented in this article is verified by references that meet all Wikipedia guidelines.

Broad in scope
The article remains focused on the main aspects of the topic, without going off on a tangent.

Neutral
There is no non-neutral point of view expressed in this article

Stable
There is no evidence of recent edit wars or other signs of instability.

Illustrated
The article utilizes images well, and all images used in the article are relevant, and have suitable copyright status and documentation

Summary
I believe that this article meets, if not exceeds, all of the requirements to obtain GA status.