Talk:Indiana Jones and the Infernal Machine/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sabre (talk) 15:43, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

I scaled down the images, but could you point me to a specific guideline for their size? What I basically did was look at a few featured articles (e.g. 1080° Snowboarding, Halo 2, Kingdom Hearts II), and they had several 640x480 screenshots etc. That's why I thought they were allowed. Prime Blue (talk) 19:59, 2 September 2010 (UTC)


 * I don't think that there is a specific guideline on how to choose size (it all falls under WP:NFCC 3b, but I'm working on the basis that 640 x 480 is likely one of the native resolutions for the game, therefore any screenshots of it should be smaller than that for NFCC purposes. There is a case put forward by some that non-free screenshots don't need to be any bigger than as used in the article, but I think that's a little extreme. -- Sabre (talk) 14:55, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Okay, I think I have addressed the issues mentioned above. I used the term "MacGuffin" further down in the article to avoid repeating "plot device" in two sentences immediately following each other. I swapped the uses now so that "plot device" comes first. That way, it should be easier to understand for readers as "MacGuffin" is not simply "thrown at them" anymore without any context. Prime Blue (talk) 22:58, 3 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Alright, its looking far stronger now. Good work, and have a GA pass! -- Sabre (talk) 10:38, 4 September 2010 (UTC)