Talk:Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade/GA1

GA Review

 * 1)  WCW - (Want to Talk) 08:08, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Nominating Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, because it meets all the needs to be a GA article.


 * Batpoddriver (talk) 10:14, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

I am glad to say that this article which was nominated for good article status has succeeded. This is how the article, as of May 17, 2009, compares against the six good article criteria:
 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):  - Expansion needed.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused): {{GAList/check|aye}
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
 * 1) It is stable.
 * Edit war between World Cinema Writer and Alientraveller.
 * 1) It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * 1) Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:

This article is stylistically well-written, and wonderfully cited. It covers all aspects of the film, from the actual plot, to the cast and marketing. Because the film is still so new, this article will change with time, just make sure that the article does not contain personal reviews (no original research). Good job to all editors who contributed to this article, and, to any future editors, keep up the good work! -Batpoddriver (talk) 10:18, 17 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much. World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 11:13, 17 May 2009 (UTC)