Talk:Indonesian Aerospace N-219

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Indonesian Aerospace N-219. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120115024059/http://www.mediaindonesia.com/read/2012/01/12/290822/21/2/PT-DI-Kembangkan-Pesawat-N-219- to http://www.mediaindonesia.com/read/2012/01/12/290822/21/2/PT-DI-Kembangkan-Pesawat-N-219-
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110815164258/http://en.indonesiafinancetoday.com/read/6423/Government-Establishes-N-219-Development-Fund to http://en.indonesiafinancetoday.com/read/6423/Government-Establishes-N-219-Development-Fund

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:16, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

COI and copyright problems unfixable
I tried to fix the problems with 's 2019-01-15T02:27:36 full text replacement, but the amount of copyright problems, neutrality issues and style imperfection have caused to revert the article back to revision 876747077. I agree with the decision; completely "fixing" all issues would have left the article in a less encyclopedic state than doing this revert. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:57, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I thought your attempts to fix and work with the COI edits were commendable, but looking at it, it was not going to be possible to fix it in a way that was better than what we had to start with, so I just thought we ought to start over. 's edits were not only copyright violations but flagrant marketing language, not encyclopedic content. - Ahunt (talk) 03:44, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Any operators?
I've done a search (English and Indonesia) for operators of this aircraft, but there don't seem to be any. Does anybody have any information about whether the project is still going ahead? Davidelit (Talk) 04:24, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
 * According to the article text itself, the first deliveries look like they are expected in 2025. - Ahunt (talk) 13:09, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi. Thanks for responding. Given all the claims of imminent production and orders over the last decade, I wondered if anyone was actually operating it. It seems not. Davidelit (Talk) 14:14, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
 * It seems "not yet". - Ahunt (talk) 15:01, 15 August 2023 (UTC)