Talk:Indonesian Christian Student Movement

Scribd issue
Anyone can upload stuff to Scribd, regardless of whether it is reliable or whether they have the copyright to it. The site is full of copyvios and self-published documents which are not acceptable as sources. During the GA review there was no evaluation of reliable sources or copyvio issues despite this being a part of the GA criteria. I notice that they have their own website so I would recommend using that, rather than scribd, as a source for official/primary sourced info on the organization. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  03:57, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Hey  buidhe  thank you so much for warning me of that! I had no idea. I did do as much of a source review as I could, but many of them were unavailable to me. I trusted the author to have acted in good faith.  I simply didn't know about this one.  Sorry. I should probably not do reviews... I'm not experienced enough. Jenhawk777 (talk) 04:16, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * , I don't mean to discourage you from doing GA reviews but please make sure that you evaluate all the criteria, including copyvio and reliability of sources. When doing GA reviews I try to stick to the topics where I'm confident that I can give the article a good evaluation. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  04:19, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * It's been a year...back then I was clumsy and stupid in regards to sources...Would the GA status still stand if I managed to substitute all of the sources? I could probably search atribution somewhere in the newspapers or thesis. --Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 04:59, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * , I know, there are definitely things I did on my first GANs that I definitely wouldn't do now. I think if you improve the sourcing and perhaps enlisted WP:GOCE to clean up the prose then it would definitely be a solid GA. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  05:04, 20 May 2021 (UTC)