Talk:Infant sleep

"Biased" content removal
, I see you have removed some content. Your edit summaries do not justify its removal: the text was not biased or obviously outdated. There was no implication that sleep disturbances should be a cause for distress; it reflects the source in saying it often does cause distress. This is not an opinion statement and is not biased, and is backed by a source. Regarding interventions, it is similar: there was no implication that interventions are mandatory or required; what it said was some facts about interventions. This is not biased. If, as you say in your edit summary, that many "world health boards" advise against it, then WP:PROVEIT; it may even be useful to add that to the article, with the source you used to "prove it". Finally, in the edit where you replaced content, the content you replaced does not need to be removed; the content you replaced it with should be added alongside it. I am going to restore that content unless there is an obvious reason I should not. Kimen8 (talk) 20:22, 22 December 2023 (UTC)


 * 1) Infant sleep training is a common intervention — source and citation?
 * 2) Distress and relation to maternal depression - will this not be more appropriate in parenting, instead of infant sleep?
 * 3) Interventions and the additional SIDS content - care to explain how self diagnosed infant sleep issues, and self administered infant sleep
 * interventions are relevant? Maleekakashyap (talk) 22:39, 22 December 2023 (UTC)