Talk:Infanta Marie Anne of Portugal

Untitled
This article should be renamed Marie Anne of Portugal, since she was a royal head, in this case of Luxembourg. Joao pais  16:08, 28 October 2007 (UTC)


 * She wasn't a "royal head". The naming conventions for royalty prescribe this name. Charles 16:48, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Infanta Marie Anne of Portugal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090503161614/http://www.angelfire.com:80/realm/gotha/gotha/thurn.html to http://www.angelfire.com/realm/gotha/gotha/thurn.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080315223745/http://www.angelfire.com/realm/gotha/gotha/saxony.html to http://www.angelfire.com/realm/gotha/gotha/saxony.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:32, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

POV
Describing the Infanta's father as having been "stripped of his titles due to his treason" strikes me as very POV, and an egregious example of "history as written by the winners". Her father perhaps attempted to regain his throne, as many deposed monarchs do, his "treason" was being, like many heriditary monarchs, an attempted absolutist. This is POV in support of the alternate line of Braganzas and certainly the republican elements, who eventually won, also regarded this as treason, but that is hardly neutral. Someone needs to word this in a better way, perhaps something like "due to his having been declared a traitor by parliamentary decree." Someone who is something of a Portugal specialist should at least try. 72.106.155.46 (talk) 00:09, 21 June 2020 (UTC)