Talk:Infected Blood Inquiry

Merger proposal
What TBM10 proposes is not normal practice and I think there should be 2 separate articles, especially given that the newer Inquiry article is likely to grow substantially over the coming weeks and months. For example, Grenfell_Tower_fire and Grenfell_Tower_Inquiry are separate articles. As is true for Hillsborough_disaster and Taylor_Report. Another example would be News_International_phone_hacking_scandal and Leveson_Inquiry, there are many other examples available on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JJEv810 (talk • contribs) 06:26, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

I propose that this article be merged into United Kingdom tainted blood scandal. I think that the content in this article can easily be explained in the context of the main scandal article, and the other article is of a reasonable size that the merging will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. --TBM10 (talk) 19:26, 17 September 2017 (UTC)