Talk:Infernal

Redirect to...
It shoudn't redirect to inferno, just add a link to also view inferno. Infernal is the name of that Danish act, and so shouln't be under inferno. Maybe the main Infernal page should be the page for that act, and add a see also link to inferno, 'cause right there are only two things it's refering to, of which one is a small part of a big article (Infernal (Warcraft)). It's not a big issue (that Warcraft spell). I'm making Infernal (Dance act) the main page for Infernal and add a see also link to inferno and the Warcraft spell. --Luigi-ish 23:17, 16 August 2006 (UTC)


 * I reverted your move, but then restored the page to a disambig instead of a redirect. First of all, there is already a discussion underway about whether to move the article. No one should be moving it at this time, especially since there is opposition. If you were not aware of the discussion, please add your vote there.


 * Second, moves should not be done by cutting and pasting content, as that separates the page history from the content. Also, it leaves behind the Talk page, as in this case, unless that is "moved" also. In a case like this, where a move target's existing history prevents ordinary users from using the move tab, the move must be left to administrators.


 * However, I do think that Infernal should have a separate disambig page from Inferno, so I have changed it back. I've also added a couple of additional entries, so it's no longer just a matter of Warcraft. --Groggy Dice 18:31, 17 August 2006 (UTC)


 * I don't think infernal should have its own disambig page either, but just that it should refer to the group in stead of inferno. But yes, now that is has more things to refer to, it should be a disambig page. And... no, I was not aware of what u wrote up there. -- Luigi-ish 20:51, 28 August 2006 (UTC)