Talk:Infitec

Schizophrenic Article
There seem to be two articles here. One for the company "Infitec GmbH", and one for the technology "Infitec". Right now this article is more about the company, but I suspect 90% of the people looking at an article on "Infitec" will be looking for information about the technology.

I must suggest information on the company should be moved to a new "Infitec GmbH" article.

Then there is the article titled "Dolby 3D" which is the primary US-brand for Infitec technology. 06:58, 25 May 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.101.123.180 (talk)

Article on the INFITEC technology not found
First: my name is Dr. Klaus Rohwer and I am an employee of INFITEC GmbH (senior scientist). I just edited the article on this company to make it more complete. But I did not find an article on the INFITEC technology. I would like to add such an article - am I allowed to do so? Klausrohwer (talk) 12:58, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for you interest in improving Wikipedia. While your assistance is appreciated, Wikipedia has a policy of discouraging edits by people financially connected with the subject of the article.  This conflict of interest policy, abbreviated as WP:COI is intended to ensure that articles are unbiased.  While it may seem counterintuitive, since after all who knows a company better than an employee, it's also unlikely that you would include anything controversial or that which would put your company or technology in a bad light, and because of that the article's neutrality would be called into question.  If you have material (or an article) you'd like to add, you can create a draft in your soapbox, and I can review it and add it myself if I can verify the information.  I'll add this page to my watchlist in case you decide to respond, and you can also leave a note in my talk page User talk:Timtempleton.  Another point I'd like to make - you included a personal conversation as a source, but since that is unverifiable, it can't be used.  Otherwise, anyone could put in anything and claim the person told them that it was true.  This has led to sometimes awkward issues, such as when author Philip Roth was unable to add truthful info to his own article because his identity and neutrality were questioned. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2012/sep/19/why-philip-roth-needs-secondary-source Plese feel free to reach out if you have any questions.  In the meantime, I'm going to edit this article a little and mark it as needing more sources.Timtempleton (talk) 05:21, 18 January 2017 (UTC)