Talk:Infracaninophile

To redirect or not to redirect?
This redirect is currently absurd in that it redirects to an article that is NOT about a synonym (though related), and that does NOT explain the term for the non-latinate reader. As user:Insertcleverphrasehere suggested, deleting the article may be an option, but I personally think the term is sufficiently notable to EITHER have a brief article (though Wikipedia is not a dictionary), OR be mentioned somehow in Underdog (term) (or Underdog, if suggested move is approved).--Nø (talk) 13:37, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I am of the opinion that it is a non notable neologism. Per WP:NEO pretty much all the books on the topic are about the term rather than using it, so I will suggest it for deletion.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 14:50, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I somehow missed the redirect discussion here, but I see it was inconclusive. I don't see how that leads to carrying out the absurd redirect (absurd in the sense that the user being redirected may have no clue why (s)he ends up at "Underdog", which isn't helpul). I think a deletion would be meaningful (but sad from my point of view), and a short article (or if possible a longer one) would be meaningful; the current situation (the redirect) is not.--Nø (talk) 11:53, 5 January 2018 (UTC)