Talk:Infrastructure for Peace

Title
The topic here is currently unclear: I would tend to go for infrastructure for peace, with the idea that this is/these are a real thing/s, not just jargon. The sources do seem to consider these to be real things, not just a formal name. Boud (talk) 22:16, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
 * infrastructures for peace - that are most widely referred to in the plural, like crimes against humanity is that article's title, not crime against humanity, even though the singular is used by the ICC; vs
 * infrastructure for peace - often talked about in the plural, but also talked about for specific infrastructures, not just the infrastructures as an ensemble; vs
 * Infrastructures for Peace or Infrastructure for Peace as a formalised administrative/political/legal object.