Talk:Infrastructure of the Brill Tramway/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: DavidCane (talk) 23:37, 31 July 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * made some copy edits
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * very widely sourced
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * not much more could be said. Main articles and station articles, cover all other aspects.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Yep
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Once again a superior product from the House of Iridescent.--DavidCane (talk) 00:59, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Once again a superior product from the House of Iridescent.--DavidCane (talk) 00:59, 1 August 2010 (UTC)