Talk:Ingraham v. Wright

Removal of Pseudo-legal Gibberish
I removed the following un-sourced text from the middle of reference 4:
 * The Supreme Court majority claimed that the Constitution's guarantee against cruel and unusual punishment does not apply to those who have committed no crime. Therefore, a murderer or other felon would be protected, but physical punishment would be allowed if the person is a child in school, or a citizen who got a parking ticket, or who got cited for some other minor infraction. The minority pointed out that there were many cases where a court had held the exact opposite.

That gibberish does not belong in the middle of a reference and it most certainly does not belong in the body of the article. AnnaBennett (talk) 14:56, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ingraham v. Wright. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110502075804/http://lawreview.law.ucdavis.edu/index.php to http://lawreview.law.ucdavis.edu/index.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:08, 14 November 2017 (UTC)