Talk:Ingrid Visser (biologist)

Untitled
It is clear that Dr Visser is a controversial figure and it is also clear that users are seeking to 'sanitize' this page by removing any references to her more controversial actions. As such this page begins to look like a 'vindication exercise' and not an unbiased resource that paints a clearer picture of her work. If people generate critics, then it is reasonable and fair that those critics be allowed to state their case. It is up to the reader to determine the validity of those claims. Journalism 101. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.244.192.50 (talk) 14:34, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, it is not journalism. WP:NOT If you think the article is biased or unclear, it would help if you can identify some specific details of this. --Pakaraki (talk) 04:18, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox_or_means_of_promotion Why is it not unreasonable to discuss her more contentious activities? Is there something to hide?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.69.194.2 (talk) 04:36, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Something to hide? None that I know of, and none that have been identified on this talk page. Please remember that this is a biography of a living person, so Wikipedia has some additional requirements. And I would recommend that you use a proper Wikipedia account, instead of editing anonymously. --Pakaraki (talk) 17:43, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Untitled
Would be C-class if not reliant on a single source. dramatic (talk) 01:00, 27 May 2011 (UTC)