Talk:Inhibitory postsynaptic current

This
This article is badly written and not very informative.


 * An IPSC is a fairly common acronym with a relatively simple definition; however, if you read much in neurobiology you may notice that it is often not defined in the texts themselves. So, originally the article was written simply to provide an elementary explanation of the idea and how it applies to the basic regime of neurobiology (and the corresponding neurochem therein).  I am not too sure what more can be said, other than lengthy examples of IPSC\EPSC pathways.  I can put some of these up if you think that will make it more informative (or please feel free to if you feel qualified).  Maybe the language can be altered to be more general in the opening paragraph?  I don't necessarily understand what is difficult to understand, and/or what type of "informative" you are hoping to establish?  Suggestions are many times more useful than content-free criticism.   Clearly this article could use expansion, and any help with improving the article is, of course, always appreciated. 128.62.97.227 20:05, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

Shouldn't this article merged with Inhibitory postsynaptic potential? To my understanding, current will generate potential, and they are almost one-to-one in this case. Memming 13:43, 2 November 2006 (UTC)