Talk:Initiations (Star Trek: Voyager)

Culluh?
I'll watch this episode again to make sure, and then change the article if I'm right, but for now just thought I'd check. The article says Culluh encourages the Kazon children to kill Chakotay, but Culluh is Nistrim, and I thought these were the Ogla. Wouldn't it be Razik, the First Maje of the Ogla? Billy Shears (talk) 14:08, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Move?

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: opposed and disowned by misattributed proposer P.T. Aufrette (talk) 00:41, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Initiations (Star Trek: Voyager) → Initiations –
 * There is no article at Initiations, it simply redirects to Initiation. At Initiation (disambiguation), there are zero articles or potential articles with the title "Initiations", the Voyager episode is the only one. I would WP:HAT it though, either for or other uses. —   fourthords  &#124; =Λ= &#124;  21:05, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I think most people would expect the plural to redirect to the singular in this case. In any case, I think fuller discussion is in order. older ≠ wiser 21:26, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose what currently links to initiations are Avadhuta, Sir John Woodroffe, Circle of Oak and Mistletoe, Sacred waters. Which illustrates why plurals usually default to generic words, though I don't know if/where this is advised in a policy or guideline page. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:34, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Strong oppose not the primary usage of the term "initiations", which is primarily the plural of "initiation". -- 76.65.131.160 (talk) 03:27, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

opposition to this discussion
I want it known that I did not start this discussion here, I did not move this discussion here, and I do not want it implied I did either thing. Despite appearances, I made no edits to this talk page and had no intention or interest in beginning a discussion here or on this topic. I vehemently object to moving my request here and making it appear as though I desired a discussion on the matter. If that user objected to my technical move request, then he or she was more than welcome to reject it there, not move it here and make it appear as though I wanted to make a spectacle or public inquisition on my request. I made no edits to this page and redact Anthony Appleyard's impersonation or implication that I did so. If users who were misled or duped into participating in this discussion wish to continue doing so, they are of course welcome to with the understanding that I am not, and never was a part or instigator of it. —  fourthords  &#124; =Λ= &#124;  10:25, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * It would be nice if when AnthonyAppleyard moves speedy renames to full discussion that he indicates such. -- 76.65.131.160 (talk) 21:00, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:51, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Kar375x540.jpg