Talk:Ink wash painting/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ganesha811 (talk · contribs) 16:33, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi! I'm opening a Good Article Nomination review. Hoping to complete the review over the next couple of days. I'll be using the template below. Thanks! Ganesha811 (talk) 16:33, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
 * - hi! I'm happy to be reviewing this article. While I haven't finished my first run-through of the GA review yet, it'd be great if you could start addressing some of the issues, particularly with sourcing. There are a number of sourcing issues (detailed below in 2b) that will be a significant obstacle to reaching GA together if they're not addressed. Thank you for your work on this article so far. Ganesha811 (talk) 14:27, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello : Thank you very much for reviewing this article. This article was completed by many Wiki friends, and I contributed about two-thirds. I will try my best to improve this article in accordance with your suggestions. Thank you. --Jujiang (talk) 03:36, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , the prose and layout changes are big, and will take a lot of work to incorporate. Right now the "lists" are sort of halfway in-between actual lists and prose, and I'm glad you agree that they should be changed to one end of the spectrum or the other. About how long do you think it will take you to make these substantial improvements? If you'd like, I can put the nomination on hold (say for two weeks) and take the time pressure off, so you can make the changes you want before I come back to reassess in a little while. What do you think? Ganesha811 (talk) 20:54, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi : I already have reference materials and it will take about 2-3 days to complete. Thank you. --Jujiang (talk) 01:00, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , ok! Ping me when you're ready for me to assess again or if you want clarification on any of my comments. Ganesha811 (talk) 01:27, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok. Thank you. --Jujiang (talk) 01:37, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi : I have improved the article according to your suggestion, please review it again. Thank you. --Jujiang (talk) 02:50, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , sure, I'll take another look. Ganesha811 (talk) 12:42, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , as you can see below, the prose issues will definitely take some time to work on - it's a big task! The small changes you made, while improvements, haven't gotten us to GA status yet. I would recommend that you let me put this GA review on hold for two weeks while you work on it, and then I can return to assess again. The other option is that I don't pass the GA nomination for now, giving you all the time you need to improve the article, and then you can re-nominate it when you are done. What do you think? Ganesha811 (talk) 13:49, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi : Don't worry, I'm writing the list into some prose confidently, and I can finish it in about two weeks. Ping you when I'm ready for you to assess again. Thank you. --Jujiang (talk) 16:03, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , given the timeline, I'm going to put the nomination on hold for two weeks. Ping me if you need me. See you on the 29th! Ganesha811 (talk) 00:50, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok, Thank you. --Jujiang (talk) 01:04, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello : I have made some adjustments and modifications to the article. Review it again when you are free. Thank you. --Jujiang (talk) 22:05, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , sure, I'll take another look this weekend. On a quick glance over, it looks much improved, though there are still issues with information provided in the lead that is not discussed in further detail elsewhere. I will specify the issues in my re-review. Ganesha811 (talk) 03:10, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

, I'm pleased to say this now passes GA review! Congratulations to you and everyone else who worked on the article. Thank you for your hard work during this review. I'll do the needful now. Ganesha811 (talk) 15:50, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi : Thank you for your valuable comments and suggestions. Thank you for improving the grammar and details. Thank you for carefully reviewing and approving this article "Yes" to GA. --Jujiang (talk) 16:15, 28 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Quick drive-by comments: the first sentence has grammar errors in it: "and also in East Asian" doesn't connect to the rest of it. Also, I'd suggest fixing the all-caps in the see also section. I'm glad to see an important article like this being nominated; best of luck with the process! &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 19:57, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your comments. I have fixed the all-caps and the grammar error of the first sentence. --Jujiang (talk) 21:00, 2 July 2021 (UTC)