Talk:Inocybe praetervisa/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 01:36, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Nice job! I took a few liberties just to speed things up, but you're used to my m.o., so no surprise there ;) Just three little things left:
 * May we have a mycomorphbox?
 * Done. J Milburn (talk) 11:40, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * In Taxonomy and naming, add info on the meaning of specific epithet praetervisa.
 * Done. I actually took a look over that source when writing, but didn't notice it mentioned the meaning of the name. J Milburn (talk) 11:40, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Does he have an established common name(s)? Rcej (Robert) - talk 04:52, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * It doesn't. This list, about the closest thing to an authority on "official" common names, doesn't even mention it. The species is uncommon and of next to no interest to non-mycologists/non-taxonomists, so there's not really any call for one. Perhaps if one of us ever ends up publishing an article on fungi, we could name it :P J Milburn (talk) 11:40, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Jeez Louise... how handy is that list! FAV'd that! Well, we pass... kudos :) Rcej (Robert) - talk 04:40, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Results of review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Inocybe praetervisa passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: