Talk:Inosperma cookei/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 04:03, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Nice job! Things to do:
 * May we have a mycomorphbox?
 * Added. I didn't add one because I thought it would be crowded, but it looks ok :) J Milburn (talk) 11:29, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * In Tax. and naming, paragraph "Inocybe cookei was first described by Giacomo Bresadola in 1892. Mycologists J. Stangl and J. Veselský described Inocybe kuthanii in 1979, which was later described as a variety of Inocybe cookei (Inocybe cookei var. kuthanii) by Thom Kuyper in 1986. Both names are now recognised as synonyms of Inocybe cookei. It is commonly known as the straw fibrecap."
 * When/why did I. cookei var. kuthanii officialy revert from variety to synonymous status?
 * I'm not sure. I have updated the section to attribute the opinion to the website MycoBank, on which we have an article. J Milburn (talk) 11:29, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Also in the section, define the specific epithet cookei. :) Rcej (Robert) - talk 07:15, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * "cookei" refers to Mordecai Cubitt Cooke, in the same way someone would name an Inocybe Inocybe milburni if I was a famous mycologist. I haven't been able to find a source for that, though, so I don't feel comfortable including it. J Milburn (talk) 11:29, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Found source & added. Sasata (talk) 14:57, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Well done... J Milburn (talk) 17:22, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

btw J. Milburn, Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
 * And the same to you :) Thanks for your review! J Milburn (talk) 11:29, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * When I saw Rcej had taken both fungus reviews with identical epithets, I couldn't help thinking he was like Santa, snacking on the offered milk and "cookei"s! Sasata (talk) 14:57, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I thought it was a lovely coincidence we had both nominated at the same time! J Milburn (talk) 17:22, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * heh...when I saw both noms from my watchlist, I was tempted to think "Cool! They've transferred it to a new genus today!!!" ;) Rcej (Robert) - talk 05:20, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Results of review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Inocybe cookei passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: