Talk:Insect mouthparts

Pedipalps
The caption for File:Tachina fly Gonia capitata feeding honey.jpg says to note the pedipalps, but according to the latter article, pedipalps are only found on members of the subphylum Chelicerata, which flies to belong to.  howcheng  {chat} 22:23, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Tachina fly Gonia capitata feeding honey.jpg to appear as POTD soon
Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Tachina fly Gonia capitata feeding honey.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on December 3, 2010. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2010-12-03. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks!  howcheng  {chat} 18:22, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Mouthparts vs. mouth parts
Mouthparts vs. mouth parts. It seems to me that it should be "Mouth parts". --Polinizador (talk) 20:41, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Can't support you there. Trophi I could go with, but "mouth parts" I cannot offhand remember having seen in any of probably hundreds of books and articles I have read down the years. Seeing it here thoroughly jarred me. There is little logic to such things, but "mouthparts" is definitely the de facto long-established dominant standard. JonRichfield (talk) 06:40, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

My uneasy feeling and my recommendations
I'm sorry, but, reading this - just the first few paragraphs - I get a very 'uneasy' feeling - the feeling being this is not written by someone, but, I think it's been copied - verbatim - from high school, or above-level textbooks.

The flow, the word-use, here, is not 'natural; it has a very scholarly feeling, and I don't get that feeling that often.

In addition, this is an encyclopaedia - meaning, it's a place for people to learn.

But, as it is (again - this is just from reading the first few paragraphs), the writing here isn't 'inviting', but, rather in an educational style.

Don't get me wrong; I'm not saying this (nor any) article should be 'dumbed-down', but, it should be written in a style, that let's a person with little, if any understanding get a grasp - and this is the opposite - it's written for people who've already had/have a background in related subjects.

I'd recommend anyone pick up any letter - of any encyclopaedia, and just open it to any article, and start to read. If you are not familiar with the article's subject, it should be written so - if you wanted more on the subject, you'd go research it - but, an encyclopaedia is not - by any definition - the be-all, end-all of any research!

UNOwenNYC 2 Aug, 2017

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Insect mouthparts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081207111424/http://www.ndsu.nodak.edu/entomology/topics/heads.htm to http://www.ndsu.nodak.edu/entomology/topics/heads.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:43, 14 November 2017 (UTC)