Talk:Inside Job (novella)

Untitled
There was some controversy over limited print run?

Fair use rationale for Image:ConnieWillis InsideJob.jpg
Image:ConnieWillis InsideJob.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:14, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Proposed move from "Inside Job (novel)" to "Inside Job (novella)"
I think this page should be moved over to Inside Job (novella). I know the story was published as a stand alone book, and the line between novel and novella is blurry, but given the story's length (99 pages in the book, 47 in the magazine ), Asimov's classification of it as a novella when originally published, and the fact that it won the Hugo Award for Best Novella, I think that's the right title for it. In fact, when I saw a red link for Inside Job (novella) on the Hugo Award for Best Novella I went ahead and created it without thinking it was already here under a different name. (My bad.) I turned that one into a redirect to this one, but an administrator is probably required to move it now. Confusionball (talk) 04:23, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ This move has been completed. — confusionball (talk) 17:49, 19 April 2008 (UTC)