Talk:Inside job

2007-02-7 Automated pywikipediabot message
--CopyToWiktionaryBot 03:37, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Should we mention 9/11 conspiracy
I say no. Because we now have the proof that the "official version" was the only "conspiracy". I've just updated the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.181.232.250 (talk) 00:28, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

I say no. This is not a list of usages of the phrase, but an article on the phrase itself.--Adamfinmo (talk) 12:41, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

The term is used principally about 9/11. You must not skip over.

- 9/11 is but one minor event in the history of the term. Stop being so ameri-centric and wake up. Our reptilian overlords are all over the world, not just the united states of embarassment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.113.168.128 (talk) 23:27, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Ibid --Adamfinmo (talk) 20:19, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

why is there a link to Alcoholics Anonymous? That has absolutly nothing to do with inside jobs. Can some one delete it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.249.220.121 (talk) 23:47, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

"Members of 12-step organizations refer to the work of recovery as an inside job, referring to the process of introspection, self-discovery, and fundamental change necessary to maintain long-term sobriety. Process of taking a moral inventory, sharing this inventory with another person, and making amends to people who were harmed by addictive behavior are fundamental to success and sobriety." This is why there is a link to AA. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dannysjgdf (talk • contribs) 02:54, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

but 9/11 is a inside job — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1017:B82D:512D:BCD0:8F5F:FEAE:DCD1 (talk) 13:20, 7 June 2015 (UTC)