Talk:Institut Polaire

Jack on fire proposed merger
Jack on fire fails to meet notability on its own merits; its biggest claim is that members of the band are members of Institut Polaire. It makes sense that that article should be moved into this one with a small section on side projects. Reasonable? —C.Fred (talk) 23:33, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

It's not a side project though, it's full band to which Blakeney will be devoting 100% of his focus in the very near future. Institut Polaire is merely an affiliation. He will be on RTR 92.1 rtrfm.com.au this Thursday morning promoting Jack On Fire and playing a live set. Garthpalmer 08:12, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

As for the suggested lack of notability, this has already been addressed by the following post: "From the notability guidelines for musicians, "Contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable; note that it is often most appropriate to use redirects in place of articles on side projects, early bands and such". I'm going to remove the speedy notice. Darksun 10:22, 14 August 2007 (UTC)" Garthpalmer 15:04, 15 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Which I agree with fully, especially the part that says "it is often most appropriate to use redirects." That's why I've proposed the move. —C.Fred (talk) 16:47, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

It's not a side-project though. The bands are very different in style and would largely attract different audiences. I'm not going to argue anymore, clearly you have a problem with this being up on here so delete it... I'll put it back up in 3-6 months once JoF establishes it's own "notability". Garthpalmer 23:00, 15 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Fair enough. Jof is now up for AfD. —C.Fred (talk) 16:21, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Citywalls.jpg
Image:Citywalls.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 12:30, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:


 * http://www.wirelessbollinger.com/content/view/829/84/
 * Triggered by  on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 18:25, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

✅ This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 03:05, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Institut Polaire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100121005914/http://www.australianmusicoffice.com/Charts/59/ to http://www.australianmusicoffice.com/Charts/59/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:54, 11 April 2017 (UTC)