Talk:Institute of Divine Metaphysical Research

Untitled
This is one of the worst articles I've ever read. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.214.105.144 (talk) 20:22, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

reverted to June 2009
Wow, I laughed and cried while going through the history here. unencyclopedic color commentary on a cut&paste copyright violation, and of course this.

I'm restoring a version from June 2009. That version isn't great either, but it's a better starting point, assuming the sources are valid (I didn't check them.)

Good luck. Kilopi (talk) 22:30, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Neutrality
It is common for any teaching, especially of a religious nature, deemed controversial to be attacked by those opposed, in manners often downright vicious and slanderous. Wars have been fought and Inquisitions conducted for this same reason.

At the same time, any neutral presentation of this teaching is very difficult, since it calls on the receiver to accept the possibility or at least a statement that they have been wrong about commonly accepted doctrines, such as that the Resurrection of our Savior was in a physical body, not as a life-giving spirit. And since Wikipedia is so easily edited, the controversy will certainly continue until Wikipedia simply eliminates the page entirely.

"Don't ask my neighbor". Go to the website, IDMR.net, then attend a class; it is free. Then judge for yourself.

Geraldpkent (talk) 18:43, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 18:58, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Institute of Divine Metaphysical Research. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061219154106/http://www.plim.org/Sacred%20Names%20Article.html to http://www.plim.org/Sacred%20Names%20Article.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:58, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Is this article worth keeping?
This article is so short, it says nothing. I suggest it be deleted. Pete unseth (talk) 22:15, 13 January 2022 (UTC)