Talk:Institute of Historic Building Conservation

Untitled
AfC Comment: Certainly Notable. But half of the sources are the organisation's own website, and the overall tone reads like a prospectus, rather than a survey of independent coverage of the institute. It's also too detailed, we don't need to know, for example, that it sometimes uses rented offices or holds meetings by vc. If it can be stripped back to neutral coverage it will be good to go. KJP1 (talk) 08:48, 10 February 2018 (UTC)