Talk:Institute of the Czech Language

Czech laws are "personal comments"?
I want to signalize mistakes in this article. Czech language institute is not regulatory body. Czech language institute doesn't regulate Czech language but only watches development of Czech language a describe it.

I am consterned that official Czech laws, which desribes role of Czech language institute, is considered as "personal comment".

I am consterned twice if I can read that official act of Czech minister is also considered as "personal comment".

Thank you for clarifying me "seriousness" of wikipedia. Congratulation for you, I am abandoning wikipedia as source of big lies.

deleted comments on article
"Note from Czech people: Czech language institute is not regulatory body of the Czech language. The one has no rights to control or regulate Czech language. This Institute caused several hard lapses in past. For example: In 1993 Czech Minister for education Ivan Pilip has officially cancelled and fixed the rules of Czech language from Czech language Institute. Many Czech people protested against the work of Czech Language Institute. Czech language institute has only passive role. The one only passive collects and researches the spontaneous evolution of Czech language. Czech language institute can determine rules for Czech language only for schools, not for official Czech language. Czech language institute changes rules for Czech language very very often, many times per century. Every Czech people meets several significant changes of Czech language – that's why (together with lapses) this instutute haven't authority to regulate Czech language."

these are not adequate for Wikipedia. 1) they are very poorly written; 2) they are personal comments. any factual content needs to be reviewed, rewriteen and properly referenced. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 21:34, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Rewritten
Although my short new text is only about 80%-sourced, it is factually correct and should not spark any controversy. If I come across relevant references, I will add them. On the legal status, there seem to be no texts online, and also, note how the Institute itself avoids the issue on its website. Littledogboy (talk) 17:30, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the rewrite, I'm just not sure what is meant by "scientific and popularization publishing" in the first sentence and have tagged it as such. - filelake shoe  &#xF0F6;   20:56, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, thanks for the proofread, I should take better care. Explained what you requested. Littledogboy (talk) 18:52, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Institute of the Czech Language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130420204330/http://avcr.cz/o_avcr/struktura/pracoviste/humanitni/UJC.html to http://www.avcr.cz/o_avcr/struktura/pracoviste/humanitni/UJC.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:31, 14 November 2017 (UTC)