Talk:Institutional seats of the European Union/GA1

GA?
Anyone got any new ideas on this? Things we could expand upon? Otherwise I was wondering about putting it up for GA to see how good it rates and if they can poke any holes in it. - J Logan t: 21:25, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Just a small note to the GA reviewer who is currently reviewing this article. As I put this forward, I would deal with anything you bring up. However I will be on an unavoidable wikibreak from tomorrow (28th) till New Year. If it can't wait till then I'm sure there is someone at WP:EU who can help and User:RCS is involved a lot in this page. Thanks for your work.- J Logan t: 09:45, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * No worries. I won't be able to review until the second. I look forward to working on this article in the new year. Best regards, Rt . 12:39, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah, I've been made slightly busy in the past few days and unfortunately it continues. I won't be able to review this article after all. Apologies for inconvenience. Best regards, Rt . 18:03, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

GA failed

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Shoot! I was away and didn't catch it when I got back. I'll get onto this soon, but to respond to your points: there is emphasis on the Parliament because it is a political issue, none of the others are. Further more the Parliament section deals with the current political issue while the history deals with the history of everything.
 * Likewise, I have no information on Frankfurt beyond that mentioned in the article regarding Luxembourg. Also, as far as I know there is no competition with other regions as these were decided in the six member era - there is however information about the agencies in other countries.
 * Thanks for the review though. (and please sign your posts Thw1309) - J Logan t: 18:31, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Shoot! I was away and didn't catch it when I got back. I'll get onto this soon, but to respond to your points: there is emphasis on the Parliament because it is a political issue, none of the others are. Further more the Parliament section deals with the current political issue while the history deals with the history of everything.
 * Likewise, I have no information on Frankfurt beyond that mentioned in the article regarding Luxembourg. Also, as far as I know there is no competition with other regions as these were decided in the six member era - there is however information about the agencies in other countries.
 * Thanks for the review though. (and please sign your posts Thw1309) - J Logan t: 18:31, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Likewise, I have no information on Frankfurt beyond that mentioned in the article regarding Luxembourg. Also, as far as I know there is no competition with other regions as these were decided in the six member era - there is however information about the agencies in other countries.
 * Thanks for the review though. (and please sign your posts Thw1309) - J Logan t: 18:31, 23 January 2008 (UTC)