Talk:Instituto de Cultura Puertorriqueña/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 22:26, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: one found and fixed. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:31, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Linkrot: None found. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:32, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * The prose is very poor throughout. This artcile should have been copy-edited before being nominated.  It does not meet WP:GACR criterion #1 "reasonably well written".  The grammar is very poor and some sentences are pretty much meaningless.
 * The lead does not summarize the artcile. Please read WP:LEAD.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * I have tagged several apparently POV statemenst which need attributins and citing.
 * The bulk of this article is sourced to the Institute itself. This is not accptable.  we need more reliable third party sources.
 * In fact the majority of the article appears to be a direct copyright violation or close paraphrase of {http://www.icp.gobierno.pr/}
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * One third part source used for a minor point, the rest is lifted from the organization's own website.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * See note above.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * This article is a long way away from from teh standards outlines at WP:GACR. You need to find some good third party reliable sources, then re-write removing all copyrighted material.  Then get it copy-edited and ask for a WP:Peer review.  When all of that has been done and all points have been addressed, renominate if you wish. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:52, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * This article is a long way away from from teh standards outlines at WP:GACR. You need to find some good third party reliable sources, then re-write removing all copyrighted material.  Then get it copy-edited and ask for a WP:Peer review.  When all of that has been done and all points have been addressed, renominate if you wish. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:52, 24 November 2010 (UTC)