Talk:Intelligent Design (book)

Probability vs Information theory
The article states "Next, using basic probabilistic reasoning, Dembski derives an instance of what Peter Medawar (in 1984) identified as the law of conservation of information..." This is problematic as probability theory and information theory are two separate fields of mathematics. I have therefore requested a quote (here on talk) to see what the hades this statement is referring to. HrafnTalkStalk 15:40, 24 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I've removed the ""Next, using basic probabilistic reasoning" per discussion above & lack of a quote. I am curious however as to how Medawar, an immunologist, is qualified to 'identify' "the law of conservation of information".

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Intelligent Design (book). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070225203050/http://www.math.jmu.edu/~rosenhjd/Detectives.pdf to http://www.math.jmu.edu/~rosenhjd/Detectives.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080313093300/http://csicop.org/sb/2000-12/reality-check.html to http://www.csicop.org/sb/2000-12/reality-check.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070225203050/http://www.math.jmu.edu/~rosenhjd/Detectives.pdf to http://www.math.jmu.edu/~rosenhjd/Detectives.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:54, 27 December 2017 (UTC)