Talk:Intelligent Diesel Engine

Peer Review
D1Engineer (talk) 15:19, 11 April 2012 (UTC) Needs alot of WORK right now it meets none of the criteria. Work on organizing your page with an info bar

The research links look promising but they need to be organized with subject headings and an info box. Focus primarily on making the subject headings then put in the information with citationsKyle285 (talk) 15:23, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Vastly incomplete. Seth4404 (talk) 15:30, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Needs structure. The banner dose not go on the main article page.Asoldavini (talk) 15:46, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Peer Review
1. We are missing the 500 words needed, and a lead section. 4 missing sections, too. We have a good amount of resources, but format of references is missing. MAke sure to create at least 500 words to make the viewers time worth while in reading your page.

2. References seem legit, but the format of them could use some work. Reference format is crucial to make Wikipedia seem like a credible source, and that is our number one reasoning in taking this class.

3. The info provided is factual and unbiased. No flow really, but easy fix. Make it seem more like a book than a stat sheet. It does feel like there's some missing content, but all easy fixes to make this a solid Wikipedia page.

Easy fixes, good work.

Thill593 (talk) 15:44, 11 April 2012 (UTC) Tyler Hill

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment
This article is the subject of an educational assignment at California Maritime Academy supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program&#32;during the 2012 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:52, 2 January 2023 (UTC)