Talk:Intercon Security

It seems this article is very much talking up Intertec security. Things like "elite guards" and such seem a little biased. &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rx350 (talk &bull; contribs).
 * I've cleaned it up some, but I would like someone else to look through it before removing the tag. Thanks. --Zsinj 21:36, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

It looks good to me. I pulled the tag off 5,feb 2006

Nice comment.... Check the name again... Good to see you're paying attention - do you work for Intertec? :-)


 * “As part of its mandate, Intercon Security instructs officers in self-defense tactics and techniques.”

Having worked for Intercon, I can tell you this is a flat-out LIE. They offer NO training of any sort, not even for basic Guard Cards. The only “training” I ever received from Intercon was a 4-hour lecture on the company’s policies, most of it centered around why overtime is good for guards and not-so-bad for the company, and a little on harassment policy. A REDDSON

Fair use rationale for Image:Intercon logo png.png
Image:Intercon logo png.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:00, 5 June 2007 (UTC)