Talk:Intercultural communication

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Shaina.M. Peer reviewers: David0808.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 January 2020 and 27 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Defnearikoglu.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 September 2020 and 18 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jasmineweremy.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 February 2021 and 22 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): JakeKalp.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 September 2021 and 14 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cmhernandez. Peer reviewers: Jhulty, Mongellip.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 November 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Iankarlovelazquez. Peer reviewers: Quzelamu.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Laurarob.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:37, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments
I have read your wikipedia written about Intercultural Communication. As you write about that, I agree on your idea. It is interaction between individuals and globally people are communicated through many source of media such as internet, skype, face-time, email etc. It is not only cross-cultural interaction but also direct communication between two individuals. I appreciate your writing about other theories that are related to this concepts. I have learned a lot. Thank you. --Jamesmin89 (talk) 01:12, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

There is a lot of wonderful content here. From the class I am currently taking it appears that there is a lot of information that is still missing from this page. As well as different theories that have been overlooked or not expanded on enough. I hope that as a class we will be able to see a lot of changes happening on this page and several of the other pages connected to this one be expanded upon. I also agree with Jamesmin89 on the topic brought up. Intercultural communication is also a direct communication between the individuals and that is one aspect that could be brought even more to the attention of the reader. Great article though, it really sets up the broad topics and ideas that are brought up in Intercultural Communication. DaChavey09 (talk) 07:43, 1 February 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DaChavey09 (talk • contribs) 07:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC)


 * I agree that this page is definitely off to a good start; however, there doesn't seem to be any link to globalization, which is very prevalent in the idea of intercultural communication. Does anyone else feel as though there should be mention and possible effects of globalization? Another thing that I note in this article is that it lacks anything regarding conflict and means of overcoming conflict through intercultural communication. I think that this article is somewhat too simplisic and needs further elaboration, any thoughts? Cgayhea (talk) 15:19, 10 June 2013 (UTC)cgayhea

This page is fairly large, however, I do not believe it encompasses the field as well as it might. We should probably look into making sure that at least each of the theories has its own page. Also, many of the topics are missing pages. Keep up the great work! - Drewbeedooo (talk) 08:06, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

I think we can expand more on the Theories, especially those related to Adapting to a different culture.]]Dbaladi10 (talk) 16:14, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Student editing project - explanation of edits
Hello, I am a nursing student from Brock university. We have been given a Wikipedia assignment to edit pages that are relevant to learning about nursing communication. This page was selected for my group to edit. I want to write this to inform you that some changes will be made on this page by my group and I. I want to link our talk page on here so that if there is anything the original editors can help us with or have something that they think should not be touched, they can voice their opinion. The part I personally worked on is intercultural competence, specifically the components of it, and the basic tools for improving it. The section about the different types of empathy had to be removed. The person who edited it, cited themselves I believe. We learned that citing yourself does not fit good Wikipedia criteria. Here is the link to our talkpage:. Here is the link to the course page if you want additional information: If you have any suggestions please feel free to voice them. Thank you, Dm14qk (talk) 14:04, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I am also a first year nursing student from Brock University. I will be editing and adding to the intercultural competence section as well. I will be adding information on factors that are valuable for intercultural competence and traits that make for competent communicators. The section also includes the term ethnocentrism which links together with the main idea of intercultural competence. Connor (talk) 03:09, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I am also a first year nursing student from Brock University in St.Catherins Ontario. As well, I have been given a Wikipedia assignment to edit pages relevant to nursing communication. For the intercultural communication page some edits will be made. I personally believed that the intercultural communication page should include more information on verbal and nonverbal communication, so I therefore took the role in editing nonverbal communication. Because this article did not contain a lot of information on non verbal communication I will be completely adding new information pulled from academic sources, as well as keeping some original information. If you would like any information on the assignment a link below to our course page is available. Thank you Ap14bq (talk) 16:32, 4 November 2014 (UTC) 

hello there fellow editors, I am also a first year nursing student at brock university. I have been assigned to edit this Wikipedia page and simply contribute more information that is focused on my communication context course, therefore I have been given the role of contributing a section on verbal communication and how it relates to the whole article of intercultural communication. this is my first time editing on Wikipedia if anyone has any suggestions feel free to communicate with me I would appreciate the feedback. happy editing Jm14lp (talk) 02:34, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

I've also been assigned to edit this page. I added information about communication to the general section. Added a note on individualistic vs. collectivistic cultural perceptions. Took out parts in problems section that seemed unimportant. Moved things around, organized subheadings. Grouped together verbal and nonverbal sections. I encourage adding credible cultural perceptions to that section. And I suggest shortening the theory section and sections without sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laurarob (talk • contribs) 16:03, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi there. I like the different theories provided in the page.There are always more but these are really inclusive.--Realyuang (talk) 21:41, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Feedback for edits
Hello,Jm14lp,Ap14bq, Connor, and Dm14qk, I am one of the nursing students assigned this topic to review and if you are willing to hear some of my feedback, I would love to give some. First off I think you all did an excellent job contributing to the article intercultural communication. I noticed that you discussed adding material to the sections “Intercultural communication competence” and as well as to the sections “Non-Verbal Communication” and “Verbal Communication”. I reviewed these areas and thought that it was a good idea to divide the section about communication competence into different sections stating what makes up this concept such as the components, traits, tools, and others. There were also good examples used for better understanding of the topic. However, I found that some of the concepts mentioned were vague such as the introductory paragraph about what communication competence means and it was confusing to follow the way it was explained. This is just my opinion so if any other users have any comments I am open to feedback. I also found that there were some inconsistencies in formatting such as the point bullets that were used in some areas of this section that were then different point bullets further down in this section. For the section on verbal communication I think that the introductory paragraph does a good job depicting the idea of what verbal communication means. Mainly the point about how the messages are being sent and received continuously between the speaker and the listener. However, I hoped to see more information on the language barrier between cultures and how this has an influence on how cultures communicate between one another and get information across. In the section about nonverbal communication I think that the image used was a good image for this specific set of information. It shows a visual image of the ways that people communicate using non-verbal concepts. Good job guys! Kd14hf (talk) 02:41, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello Kd14hf ! Thank you for your kind words! We will look into clarifying the article. We would also like to stay consistent, so will take time editing. Thanks for the feedback on those sections, we appreciate your input! Thank you for your feedback on the image, I personally found it and added it to the article; I am glad that it seems to have a positive affect for the readers! Thanks again for the input, Ap14bq (talk) 04:24, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello Kd14hf. Thank you for the compliments, means a lot ! I have changed the bullets to make them all the same for consistency.I have also tried to make the definition of communication competence more clear, although there is not many ways I can put it. Dm14qk (talk) 04:16, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello Kd14hf. Thanks for your feedback! The bullets have been changed but thanks for pointing that out. Connor (talk) 05:33, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello, editors of Intercultural Communication. Your article was assigned to me by my communications professor so that I might give feedback. Feel free to counter or agree with my feedback, or ask for clarification. Overall, your article seems well written. One thing I might point out is that to keep the Wikipedia article sounding professional throughout, utmost formal language should be attempted throughout the article. For example, in the first section entitled “Cross Cultural Business Communication” the first sentence says the phrase “…communication is very helpful in building…”. It might be better to remove the word “very”, which is an adverb that has varying subjective tone to it. It may not appear to be a big deal, but it is something to look out for throughout the article. Feel free to disagree or agree with my thoughts on this. Moving onto the section entitled “Problems in Intercultural Communication”, I notice that there are no embedded citations. This might arise the problem of the written text not having good credibility/verifiability. For the Theories section, there seems to be lots of credible information written under the subheading of “Intercultural Adaption”, as I can see all the embedded APA citations. However, to keep the section seamless, using the embedded bracketed number citations instead would be better. Do you guys agree? Overall, great new info added to the article, it looks like you guys did a thorough job editing this Wikipedia article! Keep up the good work. Jm14kq (talk) 04:11, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello Jm14kq ! Thank you for your feedback on our edits! We actually did not edit the sections "Cross Cultural Business Communication" and "Problems in Intercultural Communication" or the "Theories" section...But thanks anyways! We edited intercultural competence, verbal and non-verbal feedback! Feel free to respond back with any feedback based off of those sections! All the best, Ap14bq (talk) 04:21, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi Jm14kq. Thank you for taking the time for editing. Unfortunately we did not edit the sections you gave feedback on! We edited the information on communication. Your insight was very good on the rest of the article. Feel free to add critiques if you feel they are necessary. Dm14qk (talk) 04:16, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi Jm14kq.Thank you for your feedback but as mentioned above we did not edit those sections that you gave feedback on. But your feedback on the rest of the article was very good and useful for future edits! Connor (talk) 05:33, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi,Jm14lp,Ap14bq, Connor, and Dm14qk, I am also one of the nursing students who was assigned to review your edits. First of all, good job on the work you have done. Your edits have followed the Five Pillars of Wikipedia. The edits were well researched and informative. Based off of the feedback received from one of the other editors, just keep in mind that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia; hence the information has to be neutral and third person. Under the subsection, ‘The components of intercultural competence,’ the statement, “Let's explore into...” is written in first person. In addition, I noticed that none of the information under ‘Nonverbal Communication’ had embedded citations. The second pillar states that articles must strive for verifiable accuracy and cite reliable and credible sources. So just keep in mind to cite new information that you add on, especially factual information that involves statistics (i.e. “Nonverbal communication has been shown to account for between 65% and 93%...”). Other than that, overall, you guys did a great job on editing this article. The formatting seems consistent and the information added is relevant. Let me know if you would like further clarification. Congrats on your edit! Ak13sn (talk) 22:12, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello Ak13sn ! Thank you for taking your time to comment! I understand what you are saying about sticking to a neutral and third person tone, thanks for the insight! I actually did the non-verbal communication section myself and am glad you pointed this out! I will definitely change this immediately. It is great that you caught onto that. I will add my sources in. Thanks so much! All the best, Ap14bq (talk) 04:21, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello Ak13sn, Thank you for the kind words. I have changed the "Let's explore into" introduction to a third person introduction. Thank you for pointing that out for me, I didn't even notice I did that! Dm14qk (talk) 04:16, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi Ak13sn. Thank you for all your feedback it was very much appreciated and useful as well. Connor (talk) 05:33, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

I think the bibliography section of this article is really confusing. It does not include links to the sources either. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ninatravassos (talk • contribs) 01:14, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I am a communication student from Northwestern University. We have been given a Wikipedia assignment to edit pages that are relevant to learning about intercultural communication. I believe that you did a great job in defining intercultural communication. I have a slight suggestion regarding Nonverbal communication, you could add a paragraph about "Food" under the paragraph about object language. There are many characteristics of non-verbal communication between cultures in food, cuisine, etiquette and whatnot. Thus, I suggest you consider writing about food in non-verbal communication contexts. I will provide you with a few research articles that might help in my user page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahooith (talk • contribs) 08:05, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

The Four Distances Model
The model is based on the concept of relational distance: how people from different cultures can interact effectively or instead generate interactions based on conflict, incommunicability and misunderstandings, is strictly dependent from the feeling of "closeness" or "distance" that emerges in the interaction patterns between intercultural communicators. The 4 Distances Model, originally developed in the area of intercultural semiotics defines the four main variables that can determine relational distance. Each variable has a subset of more specific hard-type (more tangible) and soft-type (more intangible) sub-variables: Each of these "Distances Factor" can be determined by means of observation, psychometric measurements, nonverbal content-analysis and verbal content-analysis. The model has proven to be useful in the analysis of intercultural communication critical incidents, incidents due to intercultural communications misunderstanding, as in the International Space Station case and in reducing misunderstanding in Intercultural Research & Development Engineering Teams. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.171.198.120 (talk) 10:16, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
 * D1 - Distance of the Self. Defined by D1A - Hard Distances: biological differences, chronemics-timing differences between communicators emissions/decoding/feedbacks; D1B - Intangible Distances: identity/role/archetype/personality differences;
 * D2 - Communication Codes Distances (Semiolinguistic Distance). Defined by D2A: communication content (hard variables); – D2B: codes, subcodes, signs, symbols, language communication styles (soft variables)
 * D3 - Ideological and value distance: differences in: D3A core values, core beliefs, ideologies, worldviews (hard variables) and D3B peripheral attitudes and beliefs (soft variables)
 * D4 - Referential distance (personal history); D4A - experience with external world objects, physical experiences (hard variables); D4B internal sensations world, emotional past and present (soft variables)

Wiki Education assignment: ENGL-122
— Assignment last updated by Ashven20 (talk) 12:56, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Criticism as Praxis
— Assignment last updated by Benhansen11 (talk) 14:32, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Comment - Analysis
There are various areas in which this Wikipedia article on Intercultural Communication may be enhanced. First and foremost, the text suffers from a lack of coherent organisation and structure, which poses difficulties for readers in terms of navigation. In order to improve its readability, the text should be structured into distinct parts that include core principles, ideas, practical implementations, and real-life illustrations. Furthermore, there are concerns with citations; some comments lack reliable sources, therefore compromising the article's trustworthiness, particularly in the context of academic material. Every assertion, especially those pertaining to theories, must be substantiated by dependable and current sources. In order to enhance reader engagement, the article should include tangible instances, empirical analyses, or personal narratives that effectively exemplify the addressed topics. Moreover, its length might be optimised to enhance readability by reducing intricate phrases. In order to maintain the relevance of the information, it is essential to consistently update it with the latest advancements and modifications in the realm of intercultural communication. The paper should strive for lucidity by refraining from excessive scholarly terminology and use straightforward language to increase comprehension. Incorporating pertinent visuals such as photographs, charts, or multimedia would enhance the article's aesthetic appeal and facilitate the communication of intricate concepts. The article must exhibit cultural sensitivity by refraining from inadvertent prejudices or preconceptions, therefore fitting with its subject matter. Attaining equilibrium in thoughts and attitudes, particularly while engaging in discussions about delicate subjects such as cultural assimilation, is crucial. Furthermore, in order to remain up-to-date, the article should include more recent instances and advancements that reflect the always changing landscape of intercultural communication. Rectifying these concerns will greatly enhance the Wikipedia article on Intercultural Communication, becoming it more informative, captivating, and dependable for a wider readership. The Wikipedia page on Intercultural Communication needs improvement, but it's important to recognise its strengths. The article is essential for learning about the topic. It covers broad intercultural communication concepts, making it comprehensive. It also provides historical context and background to introduce the topic. While brevity is required, the article's depth shows a commitment to detail. This comprehensive approach accommodates readers of varying knowledge. The Wikipedia page on Intercultural Communication is useful for getting a basic understanding of the topic, but it could be clearer and more engaging. Fatima Al-Thani (talk) 19:15, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi I'm a student at Northwestern University and I am taking a Intercultural Communication course. Your definition on the topic of Intercultural Communication includes multiple examples and ideas behind the topic which almost convey an overall picture and idea behind the topic. But with this being said there is always room for improvement and room to add more examples in order to reach the understanding of a bigger audience. I think in some instances such as the theories and the traits examples would help the reader get a better idea of the meaning behind the points and maybe by using relatable examples or examples that may showcase a reader's background and ethnicity could help broaden your perspectives and allow the reader to grasp a greater perspective on the topic. I have provided multiple examples of research articles to help with your Intercultural Communication Wikipedia page.Nooraat97 (talk) 20:01, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Suggestions by Dana
Although the page has a lot of useful information, it might need more organizing. Rearranging or reorganizing paragraphs, for example, might significantly improve the article's logical flow and increase reader accessibility. Comprehending would be made easier by organizing thoughts into groups or by presenting them in a more organized manner. Furthermore, additional distinction between subtopics like kinesics, proxemics, and paralanguage within the "Nonverbal communication" part might be beneficial. This could be accomplished by subheadings or a more clear structure. Moreover, the paper's main focus is mostly on the difficulties and obstacles related to cross-cultural communication. It would be beneficial to include examples of successful cross-cultural contact situations or strategies to these problems in order to present a more neutral perspective. Incorporating effective case studies or solutions with problem identification would give the paper a more broad viewpoint. Additionally, clarifications and explanations of terminology and ideas, especially in the early portions, such "cultural agility," will substantially improve the article's readability and increase reader accessibility, especially for those who are not as familiar with the subject area. Lastly, given its educational substance, there are not many citations in the entire article. The article's legitimacy and usefulness would be increased by adding additional citations from credible publishers to the reference section Danaalmeer (talk) 11:27, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Comment - Suggestions to further improve the article.
After reading the article, I found that some claims are unsupported by citations. I recommend supporting each claim with a reliable source. Information and explanations dominate the article. Real examples or case studies would engage readers and show the pragmatics of intercultural communication. Image and multimedia content is lacking in the article. I suggest adding visual elements to enhance audience engagement and education. Fatima Al-Thani (talk) 14:54, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Coments On How To Improve / Evaluation
Hello I am a student studying in Northwestern Qatar have been assigned to critically evaluate a WikiPedia article, I've been closely examining the recent edits and contributions to the Wikipedia page on intercultural communication. I'd like to offer some constructive criticism based on the notes and observations made above. Firstly, I commend the effort to remove the section on different types of empathy due to self-citation issues. The link between ethnocentrism and intercultural competence is well-noted in the article. However, there's room for a more nuanced exploration of how these concepts intertwine and influence each other. Given the complexity of these topics, a deeper analysis would significantly benefit readers. The focus on enhancing sections about verbal and nonverbal communication is a step in the right direction. These elements are pivotal in intercultural exchanges, but the current content seems to lack depth, particularly regarding the language barriers between cultures. This aspect is fundamental to intercultural communication, and its superficial treatment in the article doesn't do justice to its importance. In the nonverbal communication section, the absence of embedded citations is quite concerning. For an academic platform like Wikipedia, credibility hinges on well-sourced information. Given the critical role of nonverbal cues in communication, this section requires rigorous referencing to academic sources.

On the stylistic front, maintaining a formal tone throughout the article is essential. Instances like the use of the word “very” in the “Cross Cultural Business Communication” section might seem minor but can diminish the article's scholarly aura. Professionalism in language use is non-negotiable for an encyclopedic entry. Moreover, the lack of embedded citations in sections like “Problems in Intercultural Communication” raises questions about the credibility and verifiability of the content. It’s crucial for the integrity of the article that all information, especially involving statistics or specific claims, be backed by reliable sources. The “Intercultural Adaptation” section, despite having ample information, could benefit from a more consistent citation style. This not only aids readability but also contributes to the overall scholarly feel of the article. Formatting inconsistencies, particularly in the use of bullet points, disrupt the flow and coherence. A more uniform structure would enhance the reading experience. Also, the use of first-person language in sections like ‘The components of intercultural competence’ deviates from the objective tone expected in Wikipedia articles. Wildcat2026 (talk) 18:42, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Wildcats2026

Heading text
Evaluation

The article offers a clear and accessible introduction to the concept of intercultural communication, emphasizing its relevance in a globalized world. It underscores the importance of intercultural communication in fostering cultural diversity and promoting mutual understanding. While it provides a broad overview of the topic, the article lacks depth and critical analysis. It could benefit from more specific examples, case studies, and practical advice to enrich the content. Additionally, the absence of citations and references to support the information presented weakens the article's credibility and hinders readers' ability to explore the topic further. The article simplifies the complexities of intercultural communication and does not thoroughly address the nuances, conflicts, and issues that often arise in cross-cultural interactions. Furthermore, it does not engage in a critical analysis or address potential debates and criticisms within the field of intercultural communication. Therefore, while the article serves as an introductory overview, it falls short in providing a comprehensive understanding of this multifaceted field.

37.210.65.142 (talk) 20:57, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: MIT 398 Intercultural International Communication
— Assignment last updated by Malharami (talk) 22:52, 2 November 2023 (UTC)