Talk:Intergenerationality

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 May 2019 and 3 July 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ttdoan.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:37, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Merge with Intergenerational equity, Intergenerational conflict, Inter-generational contract, andInter-generational ministry
These four articles do not present sufficient information to stand on their own. Together, they could form a coherent article about intergenerational issues. I recommend that they be merged into this article. Neelix (talk) 16:30, 12 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Intergenerational equity presents 8 unique citations, and is a widely used term that stands differentiated from all the other terms. As such, its existence is justified. Regarding the sum of these topics, to merge them under a meta-level article would reduce the substance of WP. They could be summarized under "intergenerationality" with main article links to each topic. However, a merger is not justified. I will revert any immediate merger that does not have a majority of editors in favor of it. • Freechild   'sup?   22:14, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Intergenerational Equity or Generational Equity is a specific term and should not be merged into intergenerationality. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.17.197.24 (talk) 05:30, 14 October 2008 (UTC)


 * There has been no positive response to this request in two weeks; I'm removing the proposal. • Freechild   'sup?   14:10, 26 October 2008 (UTC)


 * There is no need to be defensive. I was just sending out feelers. I have summarized each of the articles under this main article as suggested by Free Child. The only objection to the merge which has currently been voiced is that with intergenerational equity. I can see value in maintaining inter-generational ministry as a separate article as well, due to its medium length and reference section. Intergenerational conflict and inter-generational contract, however, are citationless stubs whose entireties easily fit into sections on this article. Considering that there is no information on those stubs not also located here, is there any objection to the redirecting of those two titles to their respective sections on this article? Neelix (talk) 15:29, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

I added the Importance-section template to the section on Christianity as I do not see how any current practices related to dealing with intergenerational equity are notable. There is far too little info on what the subject of the article IS and far too much information on ministry. I feel the article is really pushing the bounds of NPOV. pandich (talk) 16:34, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Intergenerationality of abuse
Intergenerationality of abuse such as child abuse is needed. Also intergenerationality of alcoholism.--Penbat (talk) 15:33, 30 October 2011 (UTC)