Talk:International Aerial Robotics Competition

GA nomination, question
This article has been nominated at GAN by an editor who appears to have carried out only two small edits. Do the main contributors agree that it meets the good article criteria, and are they happy for the nomination to go ahead? --Malleus Fatuorum 18:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * As far as I am concerned, Proceed. Firewall (talk) 20:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, then to complete the nomination you need to add to the top of this talk page. --Malleus Fatuorum 20:52, 22 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for that. This is a fascinating article, and if nobody else has in a week or so I'll probably take it on myself. In the meantime I can tell you that it will very likely fail GAN as it stands, because of the paucity of citations. I'd suggest attending to that as a matter or urgency. --Malleus Fatuorum 22:02, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Done.Firewall (talk) 23:22, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

See comments at transcluded page Talk:International Aerial Robotics Competition/GA1Firewall (talk) 19:47, 17 February 2009 (UTC)